and prwi early in the morning while it was still very dark- went out to a deserted place and prayed.
Even though just taken 8 pages to muse on this- still close to the beginning. We're hearing what Jesus is up to in this public undertaking- people have been amazed at his authority- the demons have quailed and obeyed, sick people have been cured. he's based at Capernaum at the moment- and now he's off praying before anyone else is up- I think that is significant- a discipline (necessity?) that I struggle with- but if you want to enjoy deep communion with the father- walk in step- follow strongly...
It's not a desert retreat (I suppose he's had one of those of sorts)- not sitting crosslegged on a mountain contemplating- immediately followed by action, perhaps even an expansion or next stage of the mission- out into Galilee- obedience and maybe just being, has to lead into action at some point- a pharasaical faith cops his fury. Not action for the sake of it however- somehow springing from early morning time with the father- a setting of priorities- listening for what these priorities are.. How did this time go? We don't have much to go on- Jesus outburst when the 70 return “At that same hour Jesus rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, “I thankyou, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and intelligent and have revealed them to infants; yes, father for such was your gracious will- then he moves on to saying something about his relationship with the father and still I imagine with great joy turns to the disciples and tells them how big and good it is what they have been let in on. Abba Father... Why have you forsaken me? Pray like this...our father. TR Glover suggests we should perhaps go no further in this prayer until we've got some idea of Jesus conception here- let his close knowledge of the Father ground our own.
Even with the scant information we have can probably work out a lot. There's reverence- Jesus knows the father- and if you do I imagine you are not glib- perhaps something in this with the demon's repsonse- the holy one of god (I think at the crucifixion that has gone- and there's jeering and belittling, but they here may be still held by the knowledge of Jesus person- may hate it and wish it wasn't – but it illicits a certain (high) level of respect.
Mixed with the reverence- closeness and the freedom to call the lord of heaven and earth, dad. There's honesty too- that functions with the reverence- my God, my God why have you forsaken me- right now I cannot see the goodness? of this present situation – but when you combine that with psalm 22- with the despair, trust in his goodness.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Capernaum
Capernaum- how long had it existed? not much must have approached this in its whole history. When Mark says the whole city – I bet it does mean a very large percentage of the town- And they see amazing things- and things that must be setting off many resonances and disonances in their heads. There is such a heritage with the Jews- perhaps no other people have had such a carefully preserved and 'normed' heritage – as Bruggeman says (or is it Berger) a case of universe maintenance where each generation seeks to tilt the world so the next generation holds that view of the world as well (stakes particularly high in the Jews case- and they had some powerful agents involved in the world tilting.
This must have been discussed here for years- Peter, Andrew, James and John- they were Capernaum boys- what was the population (Capernaum the nearest village to the river Jordan on the NW shores of the Sea of Galilee) Don't have anything readily available to tell me 5000?* Don't imagine it was much bigger- a size where these men would have been known or known of by much of the town- and they take up with this strange rabbi who does things unlike other rabbis of the day.
What was the effect over the years in this place? “And you Capernaum will you be exalted to heaven? No, you will be brought down to Hades. For if the deeds of power had been done in you have been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I tell you that on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.”
*Wiki answers - that Charlesworth reckons the population was between 600 and 1200.
Another site says its not known how large Capernaum was – but its thought to be under 2000.
From Archeology and the Galilean Jesus- he looks like he goes into it a fair bit- based on a likely size between 6 and 10 hectares – he says between 600 to 1500- also says that Nazareth probably fewer than 400 inhabitants, “Capernaum would have been viewed as one of the larger villages.” (p152). Reckons that Sephoris and Tiberias between 8000 and 12000.
On the whole they mustn't have taken the risk- surely when these things were happening there were many who actually thrilled with them- they saw people they knew and love being healed, family members cured of demon possession (how wide spread was it? how widespread is it? ) Was Jesus career followed with interest? Had they already 'turned' before his crucifixion? (had John 6.66 moments- or perhaps actually been there? Does the thrilling lead to an openess or an oportunity to take a risk of faith – to go along with this man for a bit and see where it leads- because there is much here that adds up? but they on the whole only do this in a very superficial australian idol type of way... Is someone like me- who has never seen anything like this- one of the one who condemns them? “God's blessing on people who don't see, and yet believe!” What does Jesus call them -you faithless generation – (Mk 9:19 you faithless generation, how much longer must I be among you? How much longer must I put up with you?)
- Strong words- strong feeling. Is this the most negative thing Jesus has to say about the people he loves and has come to save? Without faith it is impossible to please God...
O you of little faith... Abraham held up as an example of faith- because unlike Capernaum, he knew and had experienced little- but on hearing a 'voice' shifted to another world 1200 kms? from Ur to Canaan- and his knowledge grew through obediance- the willingness to take the risk on this God- and through that he found him faithful.
How much of a partnership was it between the demons and those at Capernaum that rejected Jesus?
Does the no in one direction open you up for a yes in another? Can the demons work with this sort of vacillation? how much can they encourage it?
It would seem that they had a front opened up in Capernaum- and suffered some big setbacks – as the country saw a great light- but that in this case they were able to consolidate- but perhaps the attitude of the people comes first?
And Jesus was amazed at their lack of faith and couldn't do many miracles there...
This must have been discussed here for years- Peter, Andrew, James and John- they were Capernaum boys- what was the population (Capernaum the nearest village to the river Jordan on the NW shores of the Sea of Galilee) Don't have anything readily available to tell me 5000?* Don't imagine it was much bigger- a size where these men would have been known or known of by much of the town- and they take up with this strange rabbi who does things unlike other rabbis of the day.
What was the effect over the years in this place? “And you Capernaum will you be exalted to heaven? No, you will be brought down to Hades. For if the deeds of power had been done in you have been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I tell you that on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.”
*Wiki answers - that Charlesworth reckons the population was between 600 and 1200.
Another site says its not known how large Capernaum was – but its thought to be under 2000.
From Archeology and the Galilean Jesus- he looks like he goes into it a fair bit- based on a likely size between 6 and 10 hectares – he says between 600 to 1500- also says that Nazareth probably fewer than 400 inhabitants, “Capernaum would have been viewed as one of the larger villages.” (p152). Reckons that Sephoris and Tiberias between 8000 and 12000.
On the whole they mustn't have taken the risk- surely when these things were happening there were many who actually thrilled with them- they saw people they knew and love being healed, family members cured of demon possession (how wide spread was it? how widespread is it? ) Was Jesus career followed with interest? Had they already 'turned' before his crucifixion? (had John 6.66 moments- or perhaps actually been there? Does the thrilling lead to an openess or an oportunity to take a risk of faith – to go along with this man for a bit and see where it leads- because there is much here that adds up? but they on the whole only do this in a very superficial australian idol type of way... Is someone like me- who has never seen anything like this- one of the one who condemns them? “God's blessing on people who don't see, and yet believe!” What does Jesus call them -you faithless generation – (Mk 9:19 you faithless generation, how much longer must I be among you? How much longer must I put up with you?)
- Strong words- strong feeling. Is this the most negative thing Jesus has to say about the people he loves and has come to save? Without faith it is impossible to please God...
O you of little faith... Abraham held up as an example of faith- because unlike Capernaum, he knew and had experienced little- but on hearing a 'voice' shifted to another world 1200 kms? from Ur to Canaan- and his knowledge grew through obediance- the willingness to take the risk on this God- and through that he found him faithful.
How much of a partnership was it between the demons and those at Capernaum that rejected Jesus?
Does the no in one direction open you up for a yes in another? Can the demons work with this sort of vacillation? how much can they encourage it?
It would seem that they had a front opened up in Capernaum- and suffered some big setbacks – as the country saw a great light- but that in this case they were able to consolidate- but perhaps the attitude of the people comes first?
And Jesus was amazed at their lack of faith and couldn't do many miracles there...
Monday, October 19, 2009
Whole city at your door
When evening came, that evening, when the sun had set- after sunset, - an interesting they- the people, the crowd- How soon after the event at the synagogue was this? It sounds like a big crowd- was that a result of Jesus telling the spirit to come out of the man earlier?
and the whole city was gathered around the door- polis is the word for city here- perhaps Capernaum was between a kwme (village) and a polis- in the NIV polis is translated city 86 times, town 51 and village once. Seems like a pretty big event in Capernaum- again told with a minimum of fuss- this is the town you have grown up in – you've never seen anything like this before- old bert who's been sick for 40 years has just been healed- the butcher who never shows much emotion is looking on incredulously- its all outside the door of your house. But Mark has already used amazed and astounded for the crowds reaction – don't need to dither here any more.
and he would not permit the demons to speak- because they knew him.
Must have been causing a ruckus in the spiritual realm- there's demons being turfed out in a way they mustn't have been for years (how does all that work?) must have been causing serious tremors through the evil realm- Jesus does not permit them to speak – the secrecy thing is fascinating- These were not the terms Jesus wanted his self revelation to run on- action far more important.
and the whole city was gathered around the door- polis is the word for city here- perhaps Capernaum was between a kwme (village) and a polis- in the NIV polis is translated city 86 times, town 51 and village once. Seems like a pretty big event in Capernaum- again told with a minimum of fuss- this is the town you have grown up in – you've never seen anything like this before- old bert who's been sick for 40 years has just been healed- the butcher who never shows much emotion is looking on incredulously- its all outside the door of your house. But Mark has already used amazed and astounded for the crowds reaction – don't need to dither here any more.
and he would not permit the demons to speak- because they knew him.
Must have been causing a ruckus in the spiritual realm- there's demons being turfed out in a way they mustn't have been for years (how does all that work?) must have been causing serious tremors through the evil realm- Jesus does not permit them to speak – the secrecy thing is fascinating- These were not the terms Jesus wanted his self revelation to run on- action far more important.
The kitchen table
Another euthus- and immediately- at once, as they left the synagogue they entered the house of ...
The house of Simon and Andrew, with james and john- is this something these boys had been doing most their life- growing up in the same town- over at each other's houses? There's no reminisces from the gospel writers about a typical scene in Simon and Andrews house- there was a medium sized room which we cleared out whatever was normally in the middle – or brought a table from the other room into the middle- and crowded around – dinner was always jovial- but it was afther dinner we used to really look forward to- Jesus would always thank Mildred after finishing eating for the fine meal then began to talk to us- the flickering glow of the lamp.. how different to the time 15 years early when the four of us were forced to sit there... or whatever.
There is no meal here- they've just come back from the Synagogue and Simon's mother in law sick- and Mark shows little inclination to indulge in such diversions with his events tumbling on events style. - Still there is very little of that sort of reminiscing type of thing in the gospels. Perhaps a few things- perhaps it is indulgent- a Max Lucado sort of indulgent- (not that I've read one of his books for a very long time) – indicative of our society where we all think the world revolves around us- worship songs full of I and my. Somehow this was a bigger thing than just one or four men's stories- though it doesn't seem like it would particularly be something they would have thought of putting in anyway- they are limited to John using the phrase 'the disciple whom Jesus loved' , perhaps Mark's naked running man, John's relaying a conversation Jesus had with Peter when he was following to clear up a misunderstanding about whether he was going to die or not, Matthew's use of Matthew contrasting with the other accounts use of Levi- and then the incidental things that you might expect to see in an eyewitness account- there was a lot of grass in that place- sitting down on the green grass so they looked like vegetables in a vegetable patch.
The fact that it was written as a public account though the editors and authors did exercise discretion about what they left in and out.
That it wasn't written by people kicking up their heals with the luxury of unharried remembrances- the kingdom of God had come- they were in motion, servants with jobs to do- and the writing got done in the midst of this.
Probably have to be a bit careful there- John's gospel has the feel of something that has perculated in someone's head for awhile- profound and succint usually has a fair bit behind it (In my vast experience).
Anyway- there is a sense in which it would be great to have a record of that sort of interaction between the disciples- they get together and catch up after a few years of not seeing each other- do you remember when- but another mark of authenticity – not written long enough after the event to get a 400 year legend feel that accounts of Buddha might have (do they?) and the way the disciples viewed and experienced the events precluded this as well. - all too real and everyday to make it anything else, honesty prevented it- they came to the knowledge of his divinity through living with him as a man- and it wasn't a 'from afar knowledge'. There were around three years (with some time taken out at appropriate seasons) where they lived with each other- camped out at night because they were too much of an item to camp in the towns, stayed in Bethany- stayed all over the place- travelled on the road- went on preaching tours together- When Jesus chose the 12 so that they might be with him- it was in the deepest sense- they did get to knock about with him – rub shoulders- share life- all sorts of moments; it was so they would know him (and keep on knowing him when he was 'gone' and keep on being 'with' him)- given a job and the knowledge of his person absolutely crucial to this. It is not second generation veneration.
The house of Simon and Andrew, with james and john- is this something these boys had been doing most their life- growing up in the same town- over at each other's houses? There's no reminisces from the gospel writers about a typical scene in Simon and Andrews house- there was a medium sized room which we cleared out whatever was normally in the middle – or brought a table from the other room into the middle- and crowded around – dinner was always jovial- but it was afther dinner we used to really look forward to- Jesus would always thank Mildred after finishing eating for the fine meal then began to talk to us- the flickering glow of the lamp.. how different to the time 15 years early when the four of us were forced to sit there... or whatever.
There is no meal here- they've just come back from the Synagogue and Simon's mother in law sick- and Mark shows little inclination to indulge in such diversions with his events tumbling on events style. - Still there is very little of that sort of reminiscing type of thing in the gospels. Perhaps a few things- perhaps it is indulgent- a Max Lucado sort of indulgent- (not that I've read one of his books for a very long time) – indicative of our society where we all think the world revolves around us- worship songs full of I and my. Somehow this was a bigger thing than just one or four men's stories- though it doesn't seem like it would particularly be something they would have thought of putting in anyway- they are limited to John using the phrase 'the disciple whom Jesus loved' , perhaps Mark's naked running man, John's relaying a conversation Jesus had with Peter when he was following to clear up a misunderstanding about whether he was going to die or not, Matthew's use of Matthew contrasting with the other accounts use of Levi- and then the incidental things that you might expect to see in an eyewitness account- there was a lot of grass in that place- sitting down on the green grass so they looked like vegetables in a vegetable patch.
The fact that it was written as a public account though the editors and authors did exercise discretion about what they left in and out.
That it wasn't written by people kicking up their heals with the luxury of unharried remembrances- the kingdom of God had come- they were in motion, servants with jobs to do- and the writing got done in the midst of this.
Probably have to be a bit careful there- John's gospel has the feel of something that has perculated in someone's head for awhile- profound and succint usually has a fair bit behind it (In my vast experience).
Anyway- there is a sense in which it would be great to have a record of that sort of interaction between the disciples- they get together and catch up after a few years of not seeing each other- do you remember when- but another mark of authenticity – not written long enough after the event to get a 400 year legend feel that accounts of Buddha might have (do they?) and the way the disciples viewed and experienced the events precluded this as well. - all too real and everyday to make it anything else, honesty prevented it- they came to the knowledge of his divinity through living with him as a man- and it wasn't a 'from afar knowledge'. There were around three years (with some time taken out at appropriate seasons) where they lived with each other- camped out at night because they were too much of an item to camp in the towns, stayed in Bethany- stayed all over the place- travelled on the road- went on preaching tours together- When Jesus chose the 12 so that they might be with him- it was in the deepest sense- they did get to knock about with him – rub shoulders- share life- all sorts of moments; it was so they would know him (and keep on knowing him when he was 'gone' and keep on being 'with' him)- given a job and the knowledge of his person absolutely crucial to this. It is not second generation veneration.
Demonic fear
23 starts with another euthus. There is an interesting expression the demon uses- what is there to us (= ours) and (at the same time) to you (= yours) ie, “what have we in common?” What have we to do with you? what do you want with us
I've never really thought that much about this before- here we have (in Mark at least) the first instance (apart from the temptation in the desert where Mark doesn't tell us what was said, the demonic side of things/ reaction to what Jesus is doing- And its a pretty wary stance- which seems to guess at the end game to a degree- but can't see that clearly. “What have we to do with you- what do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Something like- what is he doing here? in a domain we have had free run in pretty well,- like something out of a gangster movie or a new boy in the playground who comes with a bigger reputation than the current big boy. “Have you come to destroy us? - It knows and fears the power before it- And perhaps this is a reasonable guess as far as it goes- How does the demonic realm work? What we're the whisperings in the ranks about Jesus- what were the directives from higher up?
“I know who you are, the holy one of God.” Somehow trying to upset the applecart here (don't think I've ever written that before in my life- must be a sign of being 35- as you get older you are inexorably drawn to time honoured cliches and sayings that you never would have dreamed of when you were sensible and younger). Jesus seems to be flying under the radar- we don't know why- but we know he's dangerous so we'll try and expose him, - And why this particular expression- the holy one of God? Interesting testimony from the other side- is this like a kid saying that someone else is the teachers pet? I assume the demon was once an Angel- can it remember Jesus beside the Father? Does the have you come to destroy us, show glimpses of remembered fear of being cast from heaven and the son's part in this (did he have a part? Is it Michael Archangel in Ezekiel- or somewhere else)
There must be rules of engagement- or parameters that the Fathers sustaining power allows demons and satan to operate in but not exceed- just killing Jesus at will because he has turned up is not an option – at least the timing is not- though such a desire strangely conincided with the Father's purposes- and Jesus had a very finely nuanced understanding of his 'time'.
The interplay between human and divine or spiritual is pretty hazy to me- somehow when we die we become more of both, while here we struggle to get a handle on either end of the stick. In the Solomon islands Malcolm has prayed and someone has come back to life- and there is a far greater predominance it seems of notable crossover between the realms- here the realms are just as real- but much more opaque for the majority of people- I think I miss this reality- and am suspicious of people who seem too give it to much attention- seeing the devil under every rock. I imagine there's a middle ground.
It would seem the demon has got fairly close to the money- Jesus response is swift (he couldn't stop it before it happened it seems- he still has to react in full view of everyone- not Jesus in the pope mobile smiling serenely behind bullet proof glass- and so much more masterful because of this). Two imperatives (fimwtheti and exelthe) Be quiet and exit or come out of him. Both aorist, signifying once off action. The unclean spirit convulses him (sparaxan- wonder if spastic coming from this root?) calls out with a loud cry, and comes out of him. I think this is one of the areas where hearing this story often, innoculates you to the shock value it should have. I have never actually seen something similar- and I think it would leave a fair impression if I had. What did that great/ loud cry sound like? and it comes after an exchange that probably would break most social conventions. The crowds do not seem to be particularly surprised about a man with an unclean spirit- no mention along those lines- so there's a big difference with Australia, but what leaves its mark is the manner of its leaving- ethambethesan- amazed – bdag has , to be extraordinarily impressed or disturbed by something intr- wonder, marvel, be astonished (the context determines in a good or bad sense). - it led to that hushed murmur of a crowd when something fantastic has happened and you are impelled to turn to the person next to you even if you don't know him and say , mate you don't see that every day- what do you make of it? It's not how we've heard things before- and then the actions that go along with it- I've seen plenty of people with unclean spirits but someone who commands them and they obey...
And not surprisingly, most people who were there had something to talk about in their upcoming social exchanges for the next few weeks.
Again, it is the authority that impresses them- like me trying to tell (ask) a dissenting year 8 student to pick up a paper from the floor- the lack of authority is very apparent- and the worse the kid, the more remarkable it is if he does it.
I've never really thought that much about this before- here we have (in Mark at least) the first instance (apart from the temptation in the desert where Mark doesn't tell us what was said, the demonic side of things/ reaction to what Jesus is doing- And its a pretty wary stance- which seems to guess at the end game to a degree- but can't see that clearly. “What have we to do with you- what do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Something like- what is he doing here? in a domain we have had free run in pretty well,- like something out of a gangster movie or a new boy in the playground who comes with a bigger reputation than the current big boy. “Have you come to destroy us? - It knows and fears the power before it- And perhaps this is a reasonable guess as far as it goes- How does the demonic realm work? What we're the whisperings in the ranks about Jesus- what were the directives from higher up?
“I know who you are, the holy one of God.” Somehow trying to upset the applecart here (don't think I've ever written that before in my life- must be a sign of being 35- as you get older you are inexorably drawn to time honoured cliches and sayings that you never would have dreamed of when you were sensible and younger). Jesus seems to be flying under the radar- we don't know why- but we know he's dangerous so we'll try and expose him, - And why this particular expression- the holy one of God? Interesting testimony from the other side- is this like a kid saying that someone else is the teachers pet? I assume the demon was once an Angel- can it remember Jesus beside the Father? Does the have you come to destroy us, show glimpses of remembered fear of being cast from heaven and the son's part in this (did he have a part? Is it Michael Archangel in Ezekiel- or somewhere else)
There must be rules of engagement- or parameters that the Fathers sustaining power allows demons and satan to operate in but not exceed- just killing Jesus at will because he has turned up is not an option – at least the timing is not- though such a desire strangely conincided with the Father's purposes- and Jesus had a very finely nuanced understanding of his 'time'.
The interplay between human and divine or spiritual is pretty hazy to me- somehow when we die we become more of both, while here we struggle to get a handle on either end of the stick. In the Solomon islands Malcolm has prayed and someone has come back to life- and there is a far greater predominance it seems of notable crossover between the realms- here the realms are just as real- but much more opaque for the majority of people- I think I miss this reality- and am suspicious of people who seem too give it to much attention- seeing the devil under every rock. I imagine there's a middle ground.
It would seem the demon has got fairly close to the money- Jesus response is swift (he couldn't stop it before it happened it seems- he still has to react in full view of everyone- not Jesus in the pope mobile smiling serenely behind bullet proof glass- and so much more masterful because of this). Two imperatives (fimwtheti and exelthe) Be quiet and exit or come out of him. Both aorist, signifying once off action. The unclean spirit convulses him (sparaxan- wonder if spastic coming from this root?) calls out with a loud cry, and comes out of him. I think this is one of the areas where hearing this story often, innoculates you to the shock value it should have. I have never actually seen something similar- and I think it would leave a fair impression if I had. What did that great/ loud cry sound like? and it comes after an exchange that probably would break most social conventions. The crowds do not seem to be particularly surprised about a man with an unclean spirit- no mention along those lines- so there's a big difference with Australia, but what leaves its mark is the manner of its leaving- ethambethesan- amazed – bdag has , to be extraordinarily impressed or disturbed by something intr- wonder, marvel, be astonished (the context determines in a good or bad sense). - it led to that hushed murmur of a crowd when something fantastic has happened and you are impelled to turn to the person next to you even if you don't know him and say , mate you don't see that every day- what do you make of it? It's not how we've heard things before- and then the actions that go along with it- I've seen plenty of people with unclean spirits but someone who commands them and they obey...
And not surprisingly, most people who were there had something to talk about in their upcoming social exchanges for the next few weeks.
Again, it is the authority that impresses them- like me trying to tell (ask) a dissenting year 8 student to pick up a paper from the floor- the lack of authority is very apparent- and the worse the kid, the more remarkable it is if he does it.
Noteworthy authority
When Jesus goes to Capernaum he heads for the synagogue- he had something to say- a message to be received (or at least made known) by the Jews. The Jews there have a very definite reaction- ex e plairsonto- from the verb ekplairsw- strike with panic; astound; passive (which it is here) be struck with amazement, be overwhelmed with astonishment. - in other words nothing like when the venerated old rabbi comes to town and people respectfully listen and perhaps gain something from – or are impressed with his lore. This is more like a dip in a very cold river- doesn't feel like a gradual warming to the speaker type of situation. - for he was teaching them as one having authority and not as the scribes. Interesting out of all the possible things that they could have been astounded about- it was his authority that was picked out- here was teaching that was immediately distinguished from what they were used to – and it was the mark of authority that was responsible. We are not even told in Mark here what Jesus was saying- the point in Mark's head that seems to be important, is the way in which it was said- and the reaction this had on the people and demons listening.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Productive time
They go to Capernaum- seems to be where Jesus base is for a lot of his ministry years. Writing that it strikes me once again that Jesus only had about three of these. By far the biggest portion of his adult life was spent as a tekton- one who constructs, builder, carpenter- less frequent use – worker in stone (BDAG). On the whole most of his life is spent as a 'normal' human being- or Jew in Galilee- and we know next to nothing about it- except what we can infer from the man we see in the gospels- and what must have he spent time in before this time to become this (a thoroughgoing knowledge of the scriptures, a propensity to go away to lonely places and spend time with the father). Also the boy at 12 from Lukes account.
Just read this from Theilicke
A person who is only a path through which the daily trafffic passes, who is no more than a busy street where people go rushing by hour after hour and where there is never a moment of rest, will hardly provide soil in which the eternal seed can grow. People who are always on the go are the most in danger.
A person who can no longer be recepive 'soil' for ar least '15' minutes each day, who never allows himself to be “plowed” and opened up, never waits for what God drops into his furrow, that person has actually already lost the game at the crucial point. The rich and the great people of this world, whose names everybody knows, because they are always out where the traffic is thick, are often very poor people. It is dangerously easy for them to think they are something great when the rushing, heavy traffic keeps constantly passing over them, And yet they are infinitely poorer than a poor, nameless furrow where fruit is springing up.
Just read this from Theilicke
A person who is only a path through which the daily trafffic passes, who is no more than a busy street where people go rushing by hour after hour and where there is never a moment of rest, will hardly provide soil in which the eternal seed can grow. People who are always on the go are the most in danger.
A person who can no longer be recepive 'soil' for ar least '15' minutes each day, who never allows himself to be “plowed” and opened up, never waits for what God drops into his furrow, that person has actually already lost the game at the crucial point. The rich and the great people of this world, whose names everybody knows, because they are always out where the traffic is thick, are often very poor people. It is dangerously easy for them to think they are something great when the rushing, heavy traffic keeps constantly passing over them, And yet they are infinitely poorer than a poor, nameless furrow where fruit is springing up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)